mirror of
https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep.git
synced 2025-05-19 09:40:22 -07:00
tweak working
This commit is contained in:
parent
7eb1dd129e
commit
f9cbf7d3d4
@ -71,9 +71,9 @@ increases the times to `3.081s` for ripgrep and `11.403s` for GNU grep.
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Why should I use `ripgrep`?
|
### Why should I use `ripgrep`?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* It can replace both The Silver Searcher and GNU grep because it is faster
|
* It can replace both The Silver Searcher and GNU grep because it is generally
|
||||||
than both. (N.B. It is not, strictly speaking, a "drop-in" replacement for
|
faster than both. (N.B. It is not, strictly speaking, a "drop-in" replacement
|
||||||
both, but the feature sets are far more similar than different.)
|
for both, but the feature sets are far more similar than different.)
|
||||||
* Like The Silver Searcher, `ripgrep` defaults to recursive directory search
|
* Like The Silver Searcher, `ripgrep` defaults to recursive directory search
|
||||||
and won't search files ignored by your `.gitignore` files. It also ignores
|
and won't search files ignored by your `.gitignore` files. It also ignores
|
||||||
hidden and binary files by default. `ripgrep` also implements full support
|
hidden and binary files by default. `ripgrep` also implements full support
|
||||||
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ multiline search, then `ripgrep` may not quite meet your needs (yet).
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
### Is it really faster than everything else?
|
### Is it really faster than everything else?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Yes. A large number of benchmarks with detailed analysis for each is
|
Generally, yes. A large number of benchmarks with detailed analysis for each is
|
||||||
[available on my blog](http://blog.burntsushi.net/ripgrep/).
|
[available on my blog](http://blog.burntsushi.net/ripgrep/).
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Summarizing, `ripgrep` is fast because:
|
Summarizing, `ripgrep` is fast because:
|
||||||
|
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user