mirror of
https://github.com/BurntSushi/ripgrep.git
synced 2025-08-03 05:32:04 -07:00
1002 lines
36 KiB
Rust
1002 lines
36 KiB
Rust
use {
|
||
regex_automata::meta::Regex,
|
||
regex_syntax::hir::{
|
||
self,
|
||
literal::{Literal, Seq},
|
||
Hir,
|
||
},
|
||
};
|
||
|
||
use crate::{config::ConfiguredHIR, error::Error};
|
||
|
||
/// A type that encapsulates "inner" literal extractiong from a regex.
|
||
///
|
||
/// It uses a huge pile of heuristics to try to pluck out literals from a regex
|
||
/// that are in turn used to build a simpler regex that is more amenable to
|
||
/// optimization.
|
||
///
|
||
/// The main idea underyling the validity of this technique is the fact
|
||
/// that ripgrep searches individuals lines and not across lines. (Unless
|
||
/// -U/--multiline is enabled.) Namely, we can pluck literals out of the regex,
|
||
/// search for them, find the bounds of the line in which that literal occurs
|
||
/// and then run the original regex on only that line. This overall works
|
||
/// really really well in throughput oriented searches because it potentially
|
||
/// allows ripgrep to spend a lot more time in a fast vectorized routine for
|
||
/// finding literals as opposed to the (much) slower regex engine.
|
||
///
|
||
/// This optimization was far more important in the old days, but since then,
|
||
/// Rust's regex engine has actually grown its own (albeit limited) support for
|
||
/// inner literal optimizations. So this technique doesn't apply as much as it
|
||
/// used to.
|
||
///
|
||
/// A good example of a regex where this particular extractor helps is
|
||
/// `\s+(Sherlock|[A-Z]atso[a-z]|Moriarty)\s+`. The `[A-Z]` before the `atso`
|
||
/// in particular is what inhibits the regex engine's own inner literal
|
||
/// optimizations from kicking in. This particular regex also did not have any
|
||
/// inner literals extracted in the old implementation (ripgrep <=13). So this
|
||
/// particular implementation represents a strict improvement from both the old
|
||
/// implementation and from the regex engine's own optimizations. (Which could
|
||
/// in theory be improved still.)
|
||
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
|
||
pub(crate) struct InnerLiterals {
|
||
seq: Seq,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl InnerLiterals {
|
||
/// Create a set of inner literals from the given HIR expression.
|
||
///
|
||
/// If no line terminator was configured, then this always declines to
|
||
/// extract literals because the inner literal optimization may not be
|
||
/// valid.
|
||
///
|
||
/// Note that this requires the actual regex that will be used for a search
|
||
/// because it will query some state about the compiled regex. That state
|
||
/// may influence inner literal extraction.
|
||
pub(crate) fn new(chir: &ConfiguredHIR, re: &Regex) -> InnerLiterals {
|
||
// If there's no line terminator, then the inner literal optimization
|
||
// at this level is not valid.
|
||
if chir.config().line_terminator.is_none() {
|
||
log::trace!(
|
||
"skipping inner literal extraction, \
|
||
no line terminator is set"
|
||
);
|
||
return InnerLiterals::none();
|
||
}
|
||
// If we believe the regex is already accelerated, then just let
|
||
// the regex engine do its thing. We'll skip the inner literal
|
||
// optimization.
|
||
if re.is_accelerated() {
|
||
log::trace!(
|
||
"skipping inner literal extraction, \
|
||
existing regex is believed to already be accelerated",
|
||
);
|
||
return InnerLiterals::none();
|
||
}
|
||
// In this case, we pretty much know that the regex engine will handle
|
||
// it as best as possible, even if it isn't reported as accelerated.
|
||
if chir.hir().properties().is_alternation_literal() {
|
||
log::trace!(
|
||
"skipping inner literal extraction, \
|
||
found alternation of literals, deferring to regex engine",
|
||
);
|
||
return InnerLiterals::none();
|
||
}
|
||
let seq = Extractor::new().extract_untagged(chir.hir());
|
||
InnerLiterals { seq }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns a infinite set of inner literals, such that it can never
|
||
/// produce a matcher.
|
||
pub(crate) fn none() -> InnerLiterals {
|
||
InnerLiterals { seq: Seq::infinite() }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// If it is deemed advantageous to do so (via various suspicious
|
||
/// heuristics), this will return a single regular expression pattern that
|
||
/// matches a subset of the language matched by the regular expression that
|
||
/// generated these literal sets. The idea here is that the pattern
|
||
/// returned by this method is much cheaper to search for. i.e., It is
|
||
/// usually a single literal or an alternation of literals.
|
||
pub(crate) fn one_regex(&self) -> Result<Option<Regex>, Error> {
|
||
let Some(lits) = self.seq.literals() else { return Ok(None) };
|
||
if lits.is_empty() {
|
||
return Ok(None);
|
||
}
|
||
let mut alts = vec![];
|
||
for lit in lits.iter() {
|
||
alts.push(Hir::literal(lit.as_bytes()));
|
||
}
|
||
let hir = Hir::alternation(alts);
|
||
log::debug!("extracted fast line regex: {:?}", hir.to_string());
|
||
let re = Regex::builder()
|
||
.configure(Regex::config().utf8_empty(false))
|
||
.build_from_hir(&hir)
|
||
.map_err(Error::regex)?;
|
||
Ok(Some(re))
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// An inner literal extractor.
|
||
///
|
||
/// This is a somewhat stripped down version of the extractor from
|
||
/// regex-syntax. The main difference is that we try to identify a "best" set
|
||
/// of required literals while traversing the HIR.
|
||
#[derive(Debug)]
|
||
struct Extractor {
|
||
limit_class: usize,
|
||
limit_repeat: usize,
|
||
limit_literal_len: usize,
|
||
limit_total: usize,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl Extractor {
|
||
/// Create a new inner literal extractor with a default configuration.
|
||
fn new() -> Extractor {
|
||
Extractor {
|
||
limit_class: 10,
|
||
limit_repeat: 10,
|
||
limit_literal_len: 100,
|
||
limit_total: 64,
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Execute the extractor at the top-level and return an untagged sequence
|
||
/// of literals.
|
||
fn extract_untagged(&self, hir: &Hir) -> Seq {
|
||
let mut seq = self.extract(hir);
|
||
log::trace!("extracted inner literals: {:?}", seq.seq);
|
||
seq.seq.optimize_for_prefix_by_preference();
|
||
log::trace!(
|
||
"extracted inner literals after optimization: {:?}",
|
||
seq.seq
|
||
);
|
||
if !seq.is_good() {
|
||
log::trace!(
|
||
"throwing away inner literals because they might be slow"
|
||
);
|
||
seq.make_infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
seq.seq
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Execute the extractor and return a sequence of literals.
|
||
fn extract(&self, hir: &Hir) -> TSeq {
|
||
use regex_syntax::hir::HirKind::*;
|
||
|
||
match *hir.kind() {
|
||
Empty | Look(_) => TSeq::singleton(self::Literal::exact(vec![])),
|
||
Literal(hir::Literal(ref bytes)) => {
|
||
let mut seq =
|
||
TSeq::singleton(self::Literal::exact(bytes.to_vec()));
|
||
self.enforce_literal_len(&mut seq);
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
Class(hir::Class::Unicode(ref cls)) => {
|
||
self.extract_class_unicode(cls)
|
||
}
|
||
Class(hir::Class::Bytes(ref cls)) => self.extract_class_bytes(cls),
|
||
Repetition(ref rep) => self.extract_repetition(rep),
|
||
Capture(hir::Capture { ref sub, .. }) => self.extract(sub),
|
||
Concat(ref hirs) => self.extract_concat(hirs.iter()),
|
||
Alternation(ref hirs) => self.extract_alternation(hirs.iter()),
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Extract a sequence from the given concatenation. Sequences from each of
|
||
/// the child HIR expressions are combined via cross product.
|
||
///
|
||
/// This short circuits once the cross product turns into a sequence
|
||
/// containing only inexact literals.
|
||
fn extract_concat<'a, I: Iterator<Item = &'a Hir>>(&self, it: I) -> TSeq {
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::singleton(self::Literal::exact(vec![]));
|
||
let mut prev: Option<TSeq> = None;
|
||
for hir in it {
|
||
// If every element in the sequence is inexact, then a cross
|
||
// product will always be a no-op. Thus, there is nothing else we
|
||
// can add to it and can quit early. Note that this also includes
|
||
// infinite sequences.
|
||
if seq.is_inexact() {
|
||
// If a concatenation has an empty sequence anywhere, then
|
||
// it's impossible for the concatenantion to ever match. So we
|
||
// can just quit now.
|
||
if seq.is_empty() {
|
||
return seq;
|
||
}
|
||
if seq.is_really_good() {
|
||
return seq;
|
||
}
|
||
prev = Some(match prev {
|
||
None => seq,
|
||
Some(prev) => prev.choose(seq),
|
||
});
|
||
seq = TSeq::singleton(self::Literal::exact(vec![]));
|
||
seq.make_not_prefix();
|
||
}
|
||
// Note that 'cross' also dispatches based on whether we're
|
||
// extracting prefixes or suffixes.
|
||
seq = self.cross(seq, self.extract(hir));
|
||
}
|
||
if let Some(prev) = prev {
|
||
prev.choose(seq)
|
||
} else {
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Extract a sequence from the given alternation.
|
||
///
|
||
/// This short circuits once the union turns into an infinite sequence.
|
||
fn extract_alternation<'a, I: Iterator<Item = &'a Hir>>(
|
||
&self,
|
||
it: I,
|
||
) -> TSeq {
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::empty();
|
||
for hir in it {
|
||
// Once our 'seq' is infinite, every subsequent union
|
||
// operation on it will itself always result in an
|
||
// infinite sequence. Thus, it can never change and we can
|
||
// short-circuit.
|
||
if !seq.is_finite() {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
seq = self.union(seq, &mut self.extract(hir));
|
||
}
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Extract a sequence of literals from the given repetition. We do our
|
||
/// best, Some examples:
|
||
///
|
||
/// 'a*' => [inexact(a), exact("")]
|
||
/// 'a*?' => [exact(""), inexact(a)]
|
||
/// 'a+' => [inexact(a)]
|
||
/// 'a{3}' => [exact(aaa)]
|
||
/// 'a{3,5} => [inexact(aaa)]
|
||
///
|
||
/// The key here really is making sure we get the 'inexact' vs 'exact'
|
||
/// attributes correct on each of the literals we add. For example, the
|
||
/// fact that 'a*' gives us an inexact 'a' and an exact empty string means
|
||
/// that a regex like 'ab*c' will result in [inexact(ab), exact(ac)]
|
||
/// literals being extracted, which might actually be a better prefilter
|
||
/// than just 'a'.
|
||
fn extract_repetition(&self, rep: &hir::Repetition) -> TSeq {
|
||
let mut subseq = self.extract(&rep.sub);
|
||
match *rep {
|
||
hir::Repetition { min: 0, max, greedy, .. } => {
|
||
// When 'max=1', we can retain exactness, since 'a?' is
|
||
// equivalent to 'a|'. Similarly below, 'a??' is equivalent to
|
||
// '|a'.
|
||
if max != Some(1) {
|
||
subseq.make_inexact();
|
||
}
|
||
let mut empty = TSeq::singleton(Literal::exact(vec![]));
|
||
if !greedy {
|
||
std::mem::swap(&mut subseq, &mut empty);
|
||
}
|
||
self.union(subseq, &mut empty)
|
||
}
|
||
hir::Repetition { min, max: Some(max), .. } if min == max => {
|
||
assert!(min > 0); // handled above
|
||
let limit =
|
||
u32::try_from(self.limit_repeat).unwrap_or(u32::MAX);
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::singleton(Literal::exact(vec![]));
|
||
for _ in 0..std::cmp::min(min, limit) {
|
||
if seq.is_inexact() {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
seq = self.cross(seq, subseq.clone());
|
||
}
|
||
if usize::try_from(min).is_err() || min > limit {
|
||
seq.make_inexact();
|
||
}
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
hir::Repetition { min, max: Some(max), .. } if min < max => {
|
||
assert!(min > 0); // handled above
|
||
let limit =
|
||
u32::try_from(self.limit_repeat).unwrap_or(u32::MAX);
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::singleton(Literal::exact(vec![]));
|
||
for _ in 0..std::cmp::min(min, limit) {
|
||
if seq.is_inexact() {
|
||
break;
|
||
}
|
||
seq = self.cross(seq, subseq.clone());
|
||
}
|
||
seq.make_inexact();
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
hir::Repetition { .. } => {
|
||
subseq.make_inexact();
|
||
subseq
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Convert the given Unicode class into a sequence of literals if the
|
||
/// class is small enough. If the class is too big, return an infinite
|
||
/// sequence.
|
||
fn extract_class_unicode(&self, cls: &hir::ClassUnicode) -> TSeq {
|
||
if self.class_over_limit_unicode(cls) {
|
||
return TSeq::infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::empty();
|
||
for r in cls.iter() {
|
||
for ch in r.start()..=r.end() {
|
||
seq.push(Literal::from(ch));
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
self.enforce_literal_len(&mut seq);
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Convert the given byte class into a sequence of literals if the class
|
||
/// is small enough. If the class is too big, return an infinite sequence.
|
||
fn extract_class_bytes(&self, cls: &hir::ClassBytes) -> TSeq {
|
||
if self.class_over_limit_bytes(cls) {
|
||
return TSeq::infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
let mut seq = TSeq::empty();
|
||
for r in cls.iter() {
|
||
for b in r.start()..=r.end() {
|
||
seq.push(Literal::from(b));
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
self.enforce_literal_len(&mut seq);
|
||
seq
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if the given Unicode class exceeds the configured limits
|
||
/// on this extractor.
|
||
fn class_over_limit_unicode(&self, cls: &hir::ClassUnicode) -> bool {
|
||
let mut count = 0;
|
||
for r in cls.iter() {
|
||
if count > self.limit_class {
|
||
return true;
|
||
}
|
||
count += r.len();
|
||
}
|
||
count > self.limit_class
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if the given byte class exceeds the configured limits on
|
||
/// this extractor.
|
||
fn class_over_limit_bytes(&self, cls: &hir::ClassBytes) -> bool {
|
||
let mut count = 0;
|
||
for r in cls.iter() {
|
||
if count > self.limit_class {
|
||
return true;
|
||
}
|
||
count += r.len();
|
||
}
|
||
count > self.limit_class
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Compute the cross product of the two sequences if the result would be
|
||
/// within configured limits. Otherwise, make `seq2` infinite and cross the
|
||
/// infinite sequence with `seq1`.
|
||
fn cross(&self, mut seq1: TSeq, mut seq2: TSeq) -> TSeq {
|
||
if !seq2.prefix {
|
||
return seq1.choose(seq2);
|
||
}
|
||
if seq1
|
||
.max_cross_len(&seq2)
|
||
.map_or(false, |len| len > self.limit_total)
|
||
{
|
||
seq2.make_infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
seq1.cross_forward(&mut seq2);
|
||
assert!(seq1.len().map_or(true, |x| x <= self.limit_total));
|
||
self.enforce_literal_len(&mut seq1);
|
||
seq1
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Union the two sequences if the result would be within configured
|
||
/// limits. Otherwise, make `seq2` infinite and union the infinite sequence
|
||
/// with `seq1`.
|
||
fn union(&self, mut seq1: TSeq, seq2: &mut TSeq) -> TSeq {
|
||
if seq1.max_union_len(seq2).map_or(false, |len| len > self.limit_total)
|
||
{
|
||
// We try to trim our literal sequences to see if we can make
|
||
// room for more literals. The idea is that we'd rather trim down
|
||
// literals already in our sequence if it means we can add a few
|
||
// more and retain a finite sequence. Otherwise, we'll union with
|
||
// an infinite sequence and that infects everything and effectively
|
||
// stops literal extraction in its tracks.
|
||
//
|
||
// We do we keep 4 bytes here? Well, it's a bit of an abstraction
|
||
// leakage. Downstream, the literals may wind up getting fed to
|
||
// the Teddy algorithm, which supports searching literals up to
|
||
// length 4. So that's why we pick that number here. Arguably this
|
||
// should be a tuneable parameter, but it seems a little tricky to
|
||
// describe. And I'm still unsure if this is the right way to go
|
||
// about culling literal sequences.
|
||
seq1.keep_first_bytes(4);
|
||
seq2.keep_first_bytes(4);
|
||
seq1.dedup();
|
||
seq2.dedup();
|
||
if seq1
|
||
.max_union_len(seq2)
|
||
.map_or(false, |len| len > self.limit_total)
|
||
{
|
||
seq2.make_infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
seq1.union(seq2);
|
||
assert!(seq1.len().map_or(true, |x| x <= self.limit_total));
|
||
seq1
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Applies the literal length limit to the given sequence. If none of the
|
||
/// literals in the sequence exceed the limit, then this is a no-op.
|
||
fn enforce_literal_len(&self, seq: &mut TSeq) {
|
||
seq.keep_first_bytes(self.limit_literal_len);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[derive(Clone, Debug)]
|
||
struct TSeq {
|
||
seq: Seq,
|
||
prefix: bool,
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[allow(dead_code)]
|
||
impl TSeq {
|
||
fn empty() -> TSeq {
|
||
TSeq { seq: Seq::empty(), prefix: true }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn infinite() -> TSeq {
|
||
TSeq { seq: Seq::infinite(), prefix: true }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn singleton(lit: Literal) -> TSeq {
|
||
TSeq { seq: Seq::singleton(lit), prefix: true }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn new<I, B>(it: I) -> TSeq
|
||
where
|
||
I: IntoIterator<Item = B>,
|
||
B: AsRef<[u8]>,
|
||
{
|
||
TSeq { seq: Seq::new(it), prefix: true }
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn literals(&self) -> Option<&[Literal]> {
|
||
self.seq.literals()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn push(&mut self, lit: Literal) {
|
||
self.seq.push(lit);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn make_inexact(&mut self) {
|
||
self.seq.make_inexact();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn make_infinite(&mut self) {
|
||
self.seq.make_infinite();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn cross_forward(&mut self, other: &mut TSeq) {
|
||
assert!(other.prefix);
|
||
self.seq.cross_forward(&mut other.seq);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn union(&mut self, other: &mut TSeq) {
|
||
self.seq.union(&mut other.seq);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn dedup(&mut self) {
|
||
self.seq.dedup();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn sort(&mut self) {
|
||
self.seq.sort();
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn keep_first_bytes(&mut self, len: usize) {
|
||
self.seq.keep_first_bytes(len);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn is_finite(&self) -> bool {
|
||
self.seq.is_finite()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn is_empty(&self) -> bool {
|
||
self.seq.is_empty()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn len(&self) -> Option<usize> {
|
||
self.seq.len()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn is_exact(&self) -> bool {
|
||
self.seq.is_exact()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn is_inexact(&self) -> bool {
|
||
self.seq.is_inexact()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn max_union_len(&self, other: &TSeq) -> Option<usize> {
|
||
self.seq.max_union_len(&other.seq)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn max_cross_len(&self, other: &TSeq) -> Option<usize> {
|
||
assert!(other.prefix);
|
||
self.seq.max_cross_len(&other.seq)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn min_literal_len(&self) -> Option<usize> {
|
||
self.seq.min_literal_len()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn max_literal_len(&self) -> Option<usize> {
|
||
self.seq.max_literal_len()
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// Below are methods specific to a TSeq that aren't just forwarding calls
|
||
// to a Seq method.
|
||
|
||
/// Tags this sequence as "not a prefix." When this happens, this sequence
|
||
/// can't be crossed as a suffix of another sequence.
|
||
fn make_not_prefix(&mut self) {
|
||
self.prefix = false;
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if it's believed that the sequence given is "good" for
|
||
/// acceleration. This is useful for determining whether a sequence of
|
||
/// literals has any shot of being fast.
|
||
fn is_good(&self) -> bool {
|
||
if self.has_poisonous_literal() {
|
||
return false;
|
||
}
|
||
let Some(min) = self.min_literal_len() else { return false };
|
||
let Some(len) = self.len() else { return false };
|
||
// If we have some very short literals, then let's require that our
|
||
// sequence is itself very small.
|
||
if min <= 1 {
|
||
return len <= 3;
|
||
}
|
||
min >= 2 && len <= 64
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if it's believed that the sequence given is "really
|
||
/// good" for acceleration. This is useful for short circuiting literal
|
||
/// extraction.
|
||
fn is_really_good(&self) -> bool {
|
||
if self.has_poisonous_literal() {
|
||
return false;
|
||
}
|
||
let Some(min) = self.min_literal_len() else { return false };
|
||
let Some(len) = self.len() else { return false };
|
||
min >= 3 && len <= 8
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if the given sequence contains a poisonous literal.
|
||
fn has_poisonous_literal(&self) -> bool {
|
||
let Some(lits) = self.literals() else { return false };
|
||
lits.iter().any(is_poisonous)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Compare the two sequences and return the one that is believed to be best
|
||
/// according to a hodge podge of heuristics.
|
||
fn choose(self, other: TSeq) -> TSeq {
|
||
let (seq1, seq2) = (self, other);
|
||
if !seq1.is_finite() {
|
||
return seq2;
|
||
} else if !seq2.is_finite() {
|
||
return seq1;
|
||
}
|
||
if seq1.has_poisonous_literal() {
|
||
return seq2;
|
||
} else if seq2.has_poisonous_literal() {
|
||
return seq1;
|
||
}
|
||
let Some(min1) = seq1.min_literal_len() else { return seq2 };
|
||
let Some(min2) = seq2.min_literal_len() else { return seq1 };
|
||
if min1 < min2 {
|
||
return seq2;
|
||
} else if min2 < min1 {
|
||
return seq1;
|
||
}
|
||
// OK because we know both sequences are finite, otherwise they wouldn't
|
||
// have a minimum literal length.
|
||
let len1 = seq1.len().unwrap();
|
||
let len2 = seq2.len().unwrap();
|
||
if len1 < len2 {
|
||
return seq2;
|
||
} else if len2 < len1 {
|
||
return seq1;
|
||
}
|
||
// We could do extra stuff like looking at a background frequency
|
||
// distribution of bytes and picking the one that looks more rare, but for
|
||
// now we just pick one.
|
||
seq1
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
impl FromIterator<Literal> for TSeq {
|
||
fn from_iter<T: IntoIterator<Item = Literal>>(it: T) -> TSeq {
|
||
TSeq { seq: Seq::from_iter(it), prefix: true }
|
||
}
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
/// Returns true if it is believe that this literal is likely to match very
|
||
/// frequently, and is thus not a good candidate for a prefilter.
|
||
fn is_poisonous(lit: &Literal) -> bool {
|
||
use regex_syntax::hir::literal::rank;
|
||
|
||
lit.is_empty() || (lit.len() == 1 && rank(lit.as_bytes()[0]) >= 250)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[cfg(test)]
|
||
mod tests {
|
||
use super::*;
|
||
|
||
fn e(pattern: impl AsRef<str>) -> Seq {
|
||
let pattern = pattern.as_ref();
|
||
let hir = regex_syntax::ParserBuilder::new()
|
||
.utf8(false)
|
||
.build()
|
||
.parse(pattern)
|
||
.unwrap();
|
||
Extractor::new().extract_untagged(&hir)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
|
||
fn E(x: &str) -> Literal {
|
||
Literal::exact(x.as_bytes())
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[allow(non_snake_case)]
|
||
fn I(x: &str) -> Literal {
|
||
Literal::inexact(x.as_bytes())
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn seq<I: IntoIterator<Item = Literal>>(it: I) -> Seq {
|
||
Seq::from_iter(it)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn inexact<I>(it: I) -> Seq
|
||
where
|
||
I: IntoIterator<Item = Literal>,
|
||
{
|
||
Seq::from_iter(it)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
fn exact<B: AsRef<[u8]>, I: IntoIterator<Item = B>>(it: I) -> Seq {
|
||
Seq::new(it)
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn various() {
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"foo"), seq([E("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]foo[a-z]"), seq([I("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z](foo)(bar)[a-z]"), seq([I("foobar")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]([a-z]foo)(bar[a-z])[a-z]"), seq([I("foobar")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]([a-z]foo)([a-z]foo)[a-z]"), seq([I("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"(\d{1,3}\.){3}\d{1,3}"), seq([I(".")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]([a-z]foo){3}[a-z]"), seq([I("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z](foo[a-z]){3}[a-z]"), seq([I("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]([a-z]foo[a-z]){3}[a-z]"), seq([I("foo")]));
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
e(r"[a-z]([a-z]foo){3}(bar[a-z]){3}[a-z]"),
|
||
seq([I("foobar")])
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// These test that some of our suspicious heuristics try to "pick better
|
||
// literals."
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn heuristics() {
|
||
// Here, the first literals we stumble across are {ab, cd, ef}. But we
|
||
// keep going and our heuristics decide that {hiya} is better. (And it
|
||
// should be, since it's just one literal and it's longer.)
|
||
assert_eq!(e(r"[a-z]+(ab|cd|ef)[a-z]+hiya[a-z]+"), seq([I("hiya")]));
|
||
// But here, the first alternation becomes "good enough" that literal
|
||
// extraction short circuits early. {hiya} is probably still a better
|
||
// choice here, but {abc, def, ghi} is not bad.
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
e(r"[a-z]+(abc|def|ghi)[a-z]+hiya[a-z]+"),
|
||
seq([I("abc"), I("def"), I("ghi")])
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn literal() {
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a"]), e("a"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["aaaaa"]), e("aaaaa"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["A", "a"]), e("(?i-u)a"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["AB", "Ab", "aB", "ab"]), e("(?i-u)ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abC", "abc"]), e("ab(?i-u)c"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?-u:\xFF)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact([b"Z"]), e(r"Z"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["☃"]), e("☃"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["☃"]), e("(?i)☃"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["☃☃☃☃☃"]), e("☃☃☃☃☃"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["Δ"]), e("Δ"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["δ"]), e("δ"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["Δ", "δ"]), e("(?i)Δ"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["Δ", "δ"]), e("(?i)δ"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["S", "s", "ſ"]), e("(?i)S"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["S", "s", "ſ"]), e("(?i)s"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["S", "s", "ſ"]), e("(?i)ſ"));
|
||
|
||
let letters = "ͱͳͷΐάέήίΰαβγδεζηθικλμνξοπρςστυφχψωϊϋ";
|
||
assert_eq!(exact([letters]), e(letters));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn class() {
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a", "b", "c"]), e("[abc]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a1b", "a2b", "a3b"]), e("a[123]b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["δ", "ε"]), e("[εδ]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["Δ", "Ε", "δ", "ε", "ϵ"]), e(r"(?i)[εδ]"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn look() {
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a\Ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a\zb"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a(?m:^)b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a(?m:$)b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a\bb"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a\Bb"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a(?-u:\b)b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"a(?-u:\B)b"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"^ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"$ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"(?m:^)ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"(?m:$)ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"\bab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"\Bab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"(?-u:\b)ab"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"(?-u:\B)ab"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab^"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab$"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab(?m:^)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab(?m:$)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab\b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab\B"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab(?-u:\b)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"ab(?-u:\B)"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([I("aZ"), E("ab")]), e(r"^aZ*b"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn repetition() {
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a?"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a??"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a*?"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a")]), e(r"a+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a")]), e(r"(a+)+"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab"]), e(r"aZ{0}b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["aZb", "ab"]), e(r"aZ?b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["ab", "aZb"]), e(r"aZ??b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("aZ"), E("ab")]), e(r"aZ*b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([E("ab"), I("aZ")]), e(r"aZ*?b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("aZ")]), e(r"aZ+b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("aZ")]), e(r"aZ+?b"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["aZZb"]), e(r"aZ{2}b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("aZZ")]), e(r"aZ{2,3}b"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(abc)?"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(abc)??"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), E("b")]), e(r"a*b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([E("b"), I("a")]), e(r"a*?b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("ab")]), e(r"ab+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b")]), e(r"a*b+"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b"), E("c")]), e(r"a*b*c"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b"), E("c")]), e(r"(a+)?(b+)?c"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b"), E("c")]), e(r"(a+|)(b+|)c"));
|
||
// A few more similarish but not identical regexes. These may have a
|
||
// similar problem as above.
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a*b*c*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b"), I("c")]), e(r"a*b*c+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b")]), e(r"a*b+c"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b")]), e(r"a*b+c*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("ab"), E("a")]), e(r"ab*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("ab"), E("ac")]), e(r"ab*c"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("ab")]), e(r"ab+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("ab")]), e(r"ab+c"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("z"), E("azb")]), e(r"z*azb"));
|
||
|
||
let expected =
|
||
exact(["aaa", "aab", "aba", "abb", "baa", "bab", "bba", "bbb"]);
|
||
assert_eq!(expected, e(r"[ab]{3}"));
|
||
let expected = inexact([
|
||
I("aaa"),
|
||
I("aab"),
|
||
I("aba"),
|
||
I("abb"),
|
||
I("baa"),
|
||
I("bab"),
|
||
I("bba"),
|
||
I("bbb"),
|
||
]);
|
||
assert_eq!(expected, e(r"[ab]{3,4}"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn concat() {
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abcxyz"]), e(r"abc()xyz"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abcxyz"]), e(r"(abc)(xyz)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abcmnoxyz"]), e(r"abc()mno()xyz"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"abc[a&&b]xyz"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abcxyz"]), e(r"abc[a&&b]*xyz"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn alternation() {
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abc", "mno", "xyz"]), e(r"abc|mno|xyz"));
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
inexact([E("abc"), I("mZ"), E("mo"), E("xyz")]),
|
||
e(r"abc|mZ*o|xyz")
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abc", "xyz"]), e(r"abc|M[a&&b]N|xyz"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abc", "MN", "xyz"]), e(r"abc|M[a&&b]*N|xyz"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["aaa"]), e(r"(?:|aa)aaa"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?:|aa)(?:aaa)*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?:|aa)(?:aaa)*?"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a|b*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([E("a"), I("b")]), e(r"a|b+"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), E("b"), E("c")]), e(r"a*b|c"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a|(?:b|c*)"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a"), I("b"), E("c")]), e(r"(a|b)*c|(a|ab)*c"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
exact(["abef", "abgh", "cdef", "cdgh"]),
|
||
e(r"(ab|cd)(ef|gh)")
|
||
);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
exact([
|
||
"abefij", "abefkl", "abghij", "abghkl", "cdefij", "cdefkl",
|
||
"cdghij", "cdghkl",
|
||
]),
|
||
e(r"(ab|cd)(ef|gh)(ij|kl)")
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn impossible() {
|
||
// N.B. The extractor in this module "optimizes" the sequence and makes
|
||
// it infinite if it isn't "good." An empty sequence (generated by a
|
||
// concatenantion containing an expression that can never match) is
|
||
// considered "not good." Since infinite sequences are not actionably
|
||
// and disable optimizations, this winds up being okay.
|
||
//
|
||
// The literal extractor in regex-syntax doesn't combine these two
|
||
// steps and makes the caller choose to optimize. That is, it returns
|
||
// the sequences as they are. Which in this case, for some of the tests
|
||
// below, would be an empty Seq and not an infinite Seq.
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[a&&b]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a[a&&b]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[a&&b]b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"a[a&&b]b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a", "b"]), e(r"a|[a&&b]|b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a", "b"]), e(r"a|c[a&&b]|b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a", "b"]), e(r"a|[a&&b]d|b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["a", "b"]), e(r"a|c[a&&b]d|b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[a&&b]*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["MN"]), e(r"M[a&&b]*N"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
// This tests patterns that contain something that defeats literal
|
||
// detection, usually because it would blow some limit on the total number
|
||
// of literals that can be returned.
|
||
//
|
||
// The main idea is that when literal extraction sees something that
|
||
// it knows will blow a limit, it replaces it with a marker that says
|
||
// "any literal will match here." While not necessarily true, the
|
||
// over-estimation is just fine for the purposes of literal extraction,
|
||
// because the imprecision doesn't matter: too big is too big.
|
||
//
|
||
// This is one of the trickier parts of literal extraction, since we need
|
||
// to make sure all of our literal extraction operations correctly compose
|
||
// with the markers.
|
||
//
|
||
// Note that unlike in regex-syntax, some of these have "inner" literals
|
||
// extracted where a prefix or suffix would otherwise not be found.
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn anything() {
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"."));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?s)."));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Za-z]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Z]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Z]{0}"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Z]?"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Z]*"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"[A-Z]+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([I("1")]), e(r"1[A-Z]"));
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([I("1")]), e(r"1[A-Z]2"));
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("123")]), e(r"[A-Z]+123"));
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([I("123")]), e(r"[A-Z]+123[A-Z]+"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"1|[A-Z]|3"));
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("1"), I("2"), E("3")]), e(r"1|2[A-Z]|3"),);
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("1"), I("2"), E("3")]), e(r"1|[A-Z]2[A-Z]|3"),);
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("1"), E("2"), E("3")]), e(r"1|[A-Z]2|3"),);
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("1"), I("2"), E("4")]), e(r"1|2[A-Z]3|4"),);
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("2")]), e(r"(?:|1)[A-Z]2"));
|
||
assert_eq!(inexact([I("a")]), e(r"a.z"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn empty() {
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r""));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"^"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"$"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?m:^)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?m:$)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"\b"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"\B"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?-u:\b)"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?-u:\B)"));
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn crazy_repeats() {
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?:){4294967295}"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?:){64}{64}{64}{64}{64}{64}"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"x{0}{4294967295}"));
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), e(r"(?:|){4294967295}"));
|
||
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
Seq::infinite(),
|
||
e(r"(?:){8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}")
|
||
);
|
||
let repa = "a".repeat(100);
|
||
assert_eq!(
|
||
inexact([I(&repa)]),
|
||
e(r"a{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}{8}")
|
||
);
|
||
}
|
||
|
||
#[test]
|
||
fn optimize() {
|
||
// This gets a common prefix that isn't too short.
|
||
let s = e(r"foobarfoobar|foobar|foobarzfoobar|foobarfoobar");
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([I("foobar")]), s);
|
||
|
||
// This also finds a common prefix, but since it's only one byte, it
|
||
// prefers the multiple literals.
|
||
let s = e(r"abba|akka|abccba");
|
||
assert_eq!(exact(["abba", "akka", "abccba"]), s);
|
||
|
||
let s = e(r"sam|samwise");
|
||
assert_eq!(seq([E("sam")]), s);
|
||
|
||
// The empty string is poisonous, so our seq becomes infinite, even
|
||
// though all literals are exact.
|
||
let s = e(r"foobarfoo|foo||foozfoo|foofoo");
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), s);
|
||
|
||
// A space is also poisonous, so our seq becomes infinite. But this
|
||
// only gets triggered when we don't have a completely exact sequence.
|
||
// When the sequence is exact, spaces are okay, since we presume that
|
||
// any prefilter will match a space more quickly than the regex engine.
|
||
// (When the sequence is exact, there's a chance of the prefilter being
|
||
// used without needing the regex engine at all.)
|
||
let s = e(r"foobarfoo|foo| |foofoo");
|
||
assert_eq!(Seq::infinite(), s);
|
||
}
|
||
}
|